Being Heard?
Identifying Student Subject Positions in Research about School and Classroom Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.231216Keywords:
community, metaphors, SMART, discourse analysis, subject positions, students, reviewAbstract
-
References
Arribas-Ayllon, M., & Walkerdine, V. (2008). Foucauldian discourse analysis. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 91–108.
Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., Terry, T., & Winsor, A. (1997). Schools as caring communities: A relational approach to school reform. School Psychology Review, 26(4), 586–602.
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 627–658.
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32(3), 137–151.
Berry, R. A. (2006). Inclusion, Power, and Community:Teachers and Students Interpret the Language of Community in an Inclusion Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 489–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003489
Biesta, G. (1998). Pedagogy without humanism: Foucault and the subject of education. Interchange, 29(1), 1–16.
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking Ourselves in Education: Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
Bingham, C., & Biesta, G. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, truth, emancipation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bradbury, A. (2019). Making little neo-liberals: The production of ideal child/learner subjectivities in primary school through choice, self-improvement and ‘growth mindsets.’ Power and Education, 11(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743818816336
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy. Theory & Event, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0020
Brunila, K. (2012a). A Diminished Self: Entrepreneurial and Therapeutic Ethos Operating with a Common Aim. European Educational Research Journal, 11(4), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.4.477
Brunila, K. (2012b). From risk to resilience. Education Inquiry, 3(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i3.22046
Brunila, K., & Siivonen, P. (2016). Preoccupied with the self: Towards self-responsible, enterprising, flexible and self-centred subjectivity in education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.927721
Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 88–99.
Cremin, T., Mottram, M., Collins, F., Powell, S., & Safford, K. (2009). Teachers as readers: Building communities of readers. Literacy, 43(1), 11–19.
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751
Dewey, J. (1931, 2011). Creative Democracy—The Task before Us. In R. B. Talisse & S. F. Aikin (Eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce through the Present (pp. 150–154). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838684-010
Dewey, J. (1900, 2017). The School and Society: Being three lectures. Https://Www.Gutenberg.Org/Files/53910/53910-h/53910-h.Htm. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/53910/pg53910-images.html.utf8
Evnitskaya, N., & Morton, T. (2011). Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice. Language and Education, 25(2), 109–127.
Fasheh, M. (1990). Community education: To reclaim and transform what has been made invisible. Harvard Educational Review, 60(1), 19–36.
Felner, R. D., Favazza, A., Shim, M., Brand, S., Gu, K., & Noonan, N. (2001). Whole school improvement and restructuring as prevention and promotion: Lessons from STEP and the Project on High Performance Learning Communities. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 177–202.
Felner, R. D., Seitsinger, A. M., Brand, S., Burns, A., & Bolton, N. (2007). Creating small learning communities: Lessons from the project on high-performing learning communities about “what works” in creating productive, developmentally enhancing, learning contexts. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 209–221.
Fendler, L. (2001). Educating flexible souls. Governing the Child in the New Millennium, 119–142.
Fendler, L. (2006). Others and the problem of community. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(3), 303–326.
Fielding, M. (2012). Education as if people matter: John Macmurray, community and the struggle for democracy. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 675–692.
Fielding, M. (2013). Whole school meetings and the development of radical democratic community. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(2), 123–140.
Fine, M., Weis, L., & Powell, L. (1997). Communities of Difference: A Critical Look at Desegregated Spaces Created for and by Youth. Harvard Educational Review, 67(2), 247–285. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.2.g683217368m50530
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech (J. Pearson, Ed.). Semiotext.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics [Electronic resource] lectures at the Collége de France, 1978-1979 (M. Senellart, Ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230594180
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed [Electronic resource]. Continuum.
Furman, G. C. (1998). Postmodernism and community in schools: Unraveling the paradox. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 298–328.
García-Carrión, R., & Díez-Palomar, J. (2015). Learning communities: Pathways for educational success and social transformation through interactive groups in mathematics. European Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 151–166.
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258–291.
Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2006). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy, and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(8), 648–660.
Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 72–81).
Hamre, B., Fristrup, T., & Christensen, G. (2016). The subject of exemption: Through discourses of normalization and individualization in Denmark. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 7(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.2092
Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sub/detail.action?docID=422896
Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 451–493.
Heyes, C. J. (2010). Subjectivity and power. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Key Concepts (pp. 159–172). Acumen Publishing; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654734.012
Hilt, L. T., Riese, H., & Søreide, G. E. (2019). Narrow identity resources for future students: The 21st century skills movement encounters the Norwegian education policy context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1502356
Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.
Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. SAGE.
Kliewer, C., May Fitzgerald, L., Meyer-Mork, J., Hartman, P., English-Sand, P., & Raschke, D. (2004). Citizenship for all in the literate community: An ethnography of young children with significant disabilities in inclusive early childhood settings. Harvard Educational Review, 74(4), 373–403.
Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2005). The discursive practice of participation in an elementary classroom community. Instructional Science, 33(3), 213–250.
Kumpulainen, K., Mikkola, A., & Jaatinen, A.-M. (2014). The chronotopes of technology-mediated creative learning practices in an elementary school community. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 53–74.
McGinty, A. S., Justice, L., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2008). Sense of school community for preschool teachers serving at-risk children. Early Education and Development, 19(2), 361–384.
Nilholm, C. (2017). Smart: Ett sätt att genomföra forskningsöversikter. Studentlitteratur.
Noddings, N. (1996). On community. Educational Theory, 46(3), 245–267.
Oser, F. K., Althof, W., & Higgins‐D’Alessandro, A. (2008). The Just Community approach to moral education: System change or individual change? Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 395–415.
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323
Parker, I. (1994). Reflexive research and the grounding of analysis: Social psychology and the psy-complex. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4(4), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450040404
Parker, L., & Raihani, R. (2011). Democratizing Indonesia through education? Community participation in Islamic schooling. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 712–732.
Patoulioti, E., & Nilholm, C. (2023). What is meant by ‘community’in different theoretical traditions? An analysis of influential educational research. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1–15.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. Routledge.
Power, C. (1988). The just community approach to moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 17(3), 195–208.
Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford Univ. Press.
Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. U of Minnesota Press.
Rose, N. (2000). Community, citizenship, and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1395–1411.
Roth, W.-M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79(5), 475–502.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). Contradictions in theorizing and implementing communities in education. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.002
Savage, G. C. (2011). When worlds collide: Excellent and equitable learning communities? Australia’s ‘social capitalist’paradox? Journal of Education Policy, 26(1), 33–59.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994a). Building community in schools. Jossey-Bass San Fransisco, CA.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994b). Organizations or communities? Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(2), 214–226.
Sjöberg, L. (2014). The construction of the ideal pupil – teacher training as a discursive and governing practice. Education Inquiry, 5(4), 23136. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v5.23136
Slee, R. (2019). Belonging in an age of exclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(9), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1602366
Strike, K. A. (1993). Professionalism, democracy, and discursive communities: Normative reflections on restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 255–275.
Strike, K. A. (1999). Can schools be communities? The tension between shared values and inclusion. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 46–70.
Strike, K. A. (2000). Schools as communities: Four metaphors, three models, and a dilemma or two. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(4), 617–642.
Strike, K. A. (2004). Community, the missing element of school reform: Why schools should be more like congregations than banks. American Journal of Education, 110(3), 215–232.
Thomas, G., & Macnab, N. (2019). Intersectionality, diversity, community and inclusion: Untangling the knots. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1645892
Tomlinson, C. A., Callahan, C. M., Tomchin, E. M., Eiss, N., Imbeau, M., & Landrum, M. (1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: Addressing academic diversity in contemporary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 269–282.
Walkerdine, V. (1993). Beyond developmentalism? Theory & Psychology, 3(4), 451–469.
Walkerdine, V. (1998). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques (Ed.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation, and subjectivity (pp. 166–216). Routledge.
Watkins, M. (2007). Thwarting desire: Discursive constraint and pedagogic practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281900
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology [Electronic resource]. McGraw-Hill Education.
Wood, B. E. (2014). Participatory capital: Bourdieu and citizenship education in diverse school communities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(4), 578–597.
Youdell, D. (2006). Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Yowell, C. M., & Smylie, M. A. (1999). Self-regulation in democratic communities. The Elementary School Journal, 99(5), 469–490.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eleni Patoulioti, Claes Nilholm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As Confero is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or Confero in publishing the journal.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by Confero.
When publishing with Confero, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in Confero using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in Confero.
As evident by the markers on our homepage, Confero falls under the Creative Commons licence abbreviated BY. This means that we allow others to use, spread and elaborate on the published articles, as long as they acknowledge who published it and where it was originally published.
