Doing and Resisting Pupilness in Swedish School-Age Educare

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.231215

Keywords:

Pupilness, Pupil, Student, Children in school, School child, Children in education, Education practice, School-age educare, Fritidshem, Agency, Childhood, Institutional child

Abstract

-

Author Biography

Lina Lago, Institutionen för Tema (TEMA), Linköpings universitet

Lina Lago är docent i pedagogiskt arbete vid Institutionen för TEMA/Tema Barn.

References

Ayton, K. (2008). An ordinary school child: Agency and authority in children’s schooling, Linköping University, PhD Dissertation.

Bartholdsson, Å. (2007) Med facit i hand: Normalitet, elevskap och vänlig maktutövning i två svenska skolor. Stockholm University, PhD Dissertation.

Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9

Bodén, L. (2016). Present absences: Exploring the posthumanist entanglements of school absenteeism. Linköping university, PhD Dissertation.

Dahl, M. (2014). Fritidspedagogers handlingsrepertoar: Pedagogiskt arbete med barns olika relationer. Linné university, PhD Dissertation.

Denscombe, M. (2012). Classroom control: a sociological perspective. London: Routledge.

Elvstrand, H., & Lago, L. (2019). “You know that we are not able to go to McDonald’s”: Processes of doing participation in the Leisure Time Center. Early Child Development and Care, 189(13), 2156–2166. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1443920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1443920

Elvstrand, H., & Lago, L. (2020): Do they have a choice?: Pupils’ choices at LTCs in the intersection between tradition, values and new demands, Education Inquiry, 11(1), 54-68, https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1656505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1656505

Elvstrand, H., & Närvänen, A-L. (2016). Children’s own perspectives on participation in Leisure-time Centers in Sweden. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 496-503. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/4/6/10/

Emilson, A. (2008). Det önskvärda barnet: fostran uttryckt i vardagliga kommunikationshandlingar mellan lärare och barn i förskolan. University of Gothenburg, PhD Dissertation.

Haglund, B. (2009). Fritid som diskurs och innehåll: en problematisering av verksamheten vid ›afterschool-programs› och fritidshem. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 14(1), 22–44.

Hedrén, S., & Lago, L. (2023). Is there an ”I” in ”We”?: Staff’s discursive formations of the child in Swedish School Age Educare. Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 9. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v9.5079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v9.5079

Holmberg, L., & Börjesson, M. (2015). Ideological dilemmas in Leisure-time Centers. Nordic Studies in Education, 35(3–4), 313–331.

Jackson, P.W. (1990[1968]). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

Kofoed, J. (2008). Appropriate pupilness: Social categories intersecting in school. Childhood, 15(3), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091671

Lager, K. (2018). Att undervisa i fritidshem: omsorg, lärande och utveckling i en helhet. Educare – Vetenskapliga Skrifter, (2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2018.2.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2018.2.3

Lager, K. (2021). ”Som kompisar, fast vuxna”: Relationens betydelse för barns aktörskap i fritidshem, Barn – Forskning om barn og barndom i Norden, 39(2-3), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.5324/barn.v39i2–3.3759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5324/barn.v39i2-3.3759

Lago, L. (2014). Mellanklass kan man kalla det: Om tid och meningsskapande vid övergången från förskoleklass till årskurs ett. Linköping university, PhD Dissertation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-106055

Lago, L., & Elvstrand, H. (2021). Ett eget utrymme: Barns perspektiv på kontroll i relation till fritidshemmets gränser. Barn – Forskning om barn og barndom i Norden, 39(2-3), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.5324/barn.v39i2–3.3785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5324/barn.v39i2-3.3785

Lago, L., & Elvstrand, H. (2022). Children on the borders between institution, home and leisure: Space to fend for yourself when leaving the school-age educare centre. Early Child Development and Care, 193(11), 1715-1727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.1929200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.1929200

Lahelma, E. & Gordon, T. (1997). First day in secondary school: Learning to be a ‘professional pupil’. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361970030202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361970030202

Lofors-Nyblom, L. (2009). Elevskap och elevskapande: Om formandet av skolans elever. Umeå university, PhD Dissertation.

Löfgren, R., Löfgren, H., & Lindberg, V. (2019). Pupils’ perceptions of grades: a narrative analysis of stories about getting graded for the first time. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593104

MacNaughton, G., Hughes, P., & Smith, K. (2007). Young children’s rights and public policy: Practices and possibilities for citizenship in the early years. Children & Society, 21(6), 458-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00096.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00096.x

SFS 2010:800 The Swedish education act.

Skolverket (2022). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2022. Skolverket.

Thornberg, R. (2009). The moral construction of the good pupil embedded in school rules. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 4(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197909340874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197909340874

Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed [Elektronisk resurs]. Vetenskapsrådet.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19